Evatrix Control Center
Performance Lab
Performance
Win rate, expectancy, drawdown behavior, monthly review, and outcome distribution for institutional-grade system evaluation.
Net Return
+18.7%
Win Rate
61.8%
Profit Factor
1.84
Max Drawdown
-6.2%
Expectancy
+0.42R
Avg RR Realized
1.67R
Equity Story
Growth path and drawdown behavior
Simulated display
JanFebMarAprMayJun
Risk Ratios
Gross Profit+24.8R
Gross Loss-13.5R
Sharpe-Style View1.26
Recovery Factor3.01
Avg Hold3h 18m
Performance Read
The engine remains strongest when continuation families dominate and macro stress does not distort intraday structure.
Monthly Matrix
Period-by-period review instead of flat history
| Month | P&L | Win Rate | Drawdown | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | +3.2R | 58% | -2.1% | Stable |
| Feb | +1.8R | 54% | -3.4% | Choppy |
| Mar | +4.6R | 64% | -1.8% | Strong |
| Apr | +2.8R | 62% | -2.6% | Constructive |
| May | -0.7R | 46% | -4.1% | Defensive |
| Jun | +3.9R | 67% | -1.7% | Strong |
Outcome Distribution
TP2 / Extended Winners18
TP1 / Clean Winners26
Partial Exits11
Manual Exits7
Stop Loss22
Setup Contribution
Liquidity Reclaim
+6.4R
36%
EMA Pullback
+4.2R
28%
HTF Reclaim
+3.1R
21%
Pressure Reversal
+0.9R
15%
Performance State
Current Regime FitHealthy
ConsistencyImproving
Risk DriftContained
Equity ConditionPositive Slope
Review Notes
Performance improves when trend families dominate and breadth remains constructive.
Largest equity damage appears during mixed regimes with weak follow-through.
Continuation setups outperform reversal logic in current market structure.
Evaluation Policy
Performance should be judged by quality of returns, not only raw win rate.
Drawdown control remains as important as profit growth.
Monthly stability matters more than isolated explosive weeks.